Dynamic Telemetry is a PROPOSAL : please provide feedback! :-)

Dynamic Telemetry is not an implementation, it's a request for collaboration, that will lead to an shared understanding, and hopefully one or more implementations.

Your feedback and suggestions on this document are highly encouraged!

Please:

1. Join us, by providing comments or feedback, in our Discussions page

2. Submit a PR with changes to this file ( docs/Scenarios.Overview.CostReduction.document.md)

Direct Sharing URL

http://microsoft.github.io/DynamicTelemetry/docs/Scenarios.Overview.CostReduction.document/

Costs Reduction

Dynamic Telemetry is a powerful tool that can be used to significantly reduce costs by converting logs into metrics dynamically. This capability allows organizations to gain valuable insights without the overhead of storing and processing large volumes of log data. By transforming logs into metrics, businesses can focus on the most critical data points, leading to more efficient resource utilization and cost savings.

One of the key features of Dynamic Telemetry is its ability to measure and suppress chatty telemetry. Chatty telemetry refers to the excessive and often redundant logging that can occur in a system, leading to increased storage and processing costs. With Dynamic Telemetry, organizations can rapidly turn off and turn on chatty logs, ensuring that only the most relevant data is captured and analyzed. This dynamic control over telemetry helps in maintaining a balance between comprehensive monitoring and cost efficiency.

By leveraging Dynamic Telemetry, businesses can not only optimize their logging practices but also enhance their overall observability and diagnostics. This approach ensures that resources are allocated effectively, reducing unnecessary expenditures and improving the bottom line.

Introducing Your Tools : Filtering, Flight Recorders, and Converting Logs to Metrics

Converting logs into metrics is a powerful technique used in Dynamic Telemetry to optimize monitoring and reduce the overhead associated with storing and processing large volumes of log data. This process involves several key steps:

1. Log Collection: The first step is to collect logs from various sources within the system. These logs contain detailed information about events and operations occurring within the system.

2. Log Filtering and Aggregation: Once the logs are collected, they are filtered and aggregated to extract meaningful data. This is where the query language processor comes into play. It integrates into the logging stream, monitoring events by applying straightforward query language filtering and aggregate functions. This helps in reducing the volume of data by focusing on the most critical information.

3. Metric Conversion: After filtering and aggregation, the relevant log data can be converted into metrics.

4. Metric Emission: The final step is to emit the metrics into your standard and existing metrics solution / dashboard. These metrics provide a high-level overview of the system's performance and can be used to track key performance indicators (KPIs) and other important metrics.

By converting logs into metrics, you can gain valuable insights without the overhead of storing and processing large volumes of log data. This approach ensures that resources are allocated effectively, reducing unnecessary costs, improving search performance, and improving the bottom line.

Understanding By Example

Organize Chatty Diagnostic Logs into Toggle Traces

Toggle Traces are perhaps one of the most interesting features of Dynamic Telemetry. Toggle traces refer to the ability to dynamically enable or disable specific tracing points within a system. This feature is particularly useful in scenarios where you need to control the verbosity of logging without redeploying or restarting the application. By dynamically toggling traces on and off, you can focus on capturing the most relevant data for diagnostics and performance monitoring, while suppressing unnecessary or "chatty" logs that can lead to increased storage and processing costs.

The on/off switch doesn't have to be manually flipped; telemetry can be bundled into themes, and these themes can be toggled on/off based on system observation.

In the context of Dynamic Telemetry, toggle traces allow you to:

1. Enable or Disable Tracing Points: You can turn on or off specific tracing points based on the current diagnostic needs. This helps in reducing the overhead associated with continuous logging.

2. Control Log Verbosity: By toggling traces, you can adjust the level of detail captured in the logs. This is useful for isolating issues without being overwhelmed by excessive log data.

3. Dynamic Adjustments: Toggle traces provide the flexibility to make real-time adjustments to the logging configuration. This means you can respond to issues as they arise without waiting for a new deployment cycle.

For example, if you notice that a particular component is generating too many logs, you can dynamically disable the tracing for that component. Conversely, if you need more detailed information about a specific operation, you can enable additional tracing points to capture that data.

This approach ensures that you have the right balance between comprehensive monitoring and cost efficiency, allowing you to maintain optimal system performance while still gathering the necessary diagnostic information.

Drop Chatty / Unused Logs

Not all telemetry data remains valuable over time. Chatty telemetry, which refers to excessive and often redundant logging, can become a burden rather than a benefit. Initially, this type of telemetry might have been useful for diagnosing issues and understanding system behavior, but as the system evolves, the relevance of such detailed logs can diminish.

Dropping chatty telemetry that once was useful but now is not can lead to significant improvements in system performance and cost efficiency. By eliminating unnecessary logs, organizations can reduce the storage and processing overhead associated with handling large volumes of data. This not only frees up resources but also enhances the overall observability and diagnostics of the system. With fewer logs to sift through, it becomes easier to focus on the most critical data points, leading to more effective monitoring and quicker issue resolution.

Moreover, the dynamic control over telemetry allows for a more flexible and responsive approach to system monitoring. By selectively enabling or disabling specific tracing points, businesses can maintain a balance between comprehensive monitoring and cost efficiency. This approach ensures that only the most relevant data is captured and analyzed, reducing the noise and improving the signal-to-noise ratio in the telemetry data. Ultimately, dropping chatty telemetry that is no longer useful helps in maintaining optimal system performance while still gathering the necessary diagnostic information1.

A Deeper Understanding : Removing the Worry of Scarcity in your Dev Team

The fear of not having enough telemetry can be a significant source of anxiety for engineers and administrators. Telemetry data is crucial for understanding the health and performance of a system, and the absence of sufficient data can lead to a feeling of uncertainty and worry. This fear often stems from the concern that without adequate telemetry, it may be challenging to identify and resolve issues promptly, potentially leading to system downtime or degraded performance.

Safe deployment practices, such as deploying software in rings gradually over time, can inadvertently exacerbate this anxiety. While these practices are designed to minimize the risk of widespread issues by releasing updates to a small subset of users before a broader rollout, they can also heighten the fear of missing critical telemetry during the initial deployment phases. This incremental approach may compel engineers to enable extensive logging to capture every possible issue that might arise in the early rings, fearing that any gap in data could lead to undetected problems. Consequently, the drive to ensure comprehensive monitoring in these controlled environments can result in an overwhelming volume of log data, compounding the challenges of managing and analyzing telemetry effectively.

This anxiety can drive individuals to overvalue individual logs, believing that every piece of log data is critical for diagnostics. As a result, there is a tendency to collect and retain vast volumes of log data, regardless of its relevance or usefulness. This approach, while well-intentioned, can lead to several negative consequences. The sheer volume of logs can become overwhelming, making it difficult to sift through the data to find meaningful insights. Additionally, the storage and processing of excessive log data can incur significant costs, both in terms of infrastructure and operational overhead.

Moreover, the overemphasis on individual logs can detract from a more strategic approach to telemetry. Instead of focusing on the most relevant and actionable data, the emphasis on quantity over quality can lead to inefficiencies and missed opportunities for optimization. By prioritizing the collection of high-value telemetry and leveraging tools like Dynamic Telemetry to convert logs into metrics and suppress chatty telemetry, organizations can achieve a more balanced and cost-effective approach to system diagnostics.

In conclusion, while the fear of insufficient telemetry is understandable, it is essential to adopt a measured and strategic approach to data collection. By focusing on the most critical data points and utilizing advanced telemetry tools, organizations can mitigate the risks associated with inadequate telemetry while avoiding the pitfalls of excessive log collection.