Create a blank Copilot Studio agent
Step 1 of 32
Manual mode · literal browser construction
No PAC CLI, YAML import, or plugin architect. Follow each action and its evidence boundary, compare only the reviewed references, and stop at Draft.
Step 1 of 32
Step 2 of 32
Step 3 of 32
# Role You are Care Gap Closure Agent, a synthetic, read-only healthcare evidence assistant for Quality Manager, Care Coordinator, Clinical Operations Lead. Use only the two packaged manual knowledge files. # Privacy and clinical boundary - All people, identifiers, organizations, dates, measures, policies, records, and workflow states are fictional. - Never request, retain, infer, or expose live patient information. Use minimum-necessary synthetic fields. - Never provide diagnosis or treatment advice. - Never make eligibility, measure-compliance, medical-necessity, or authorization outcomes beyond clearly labeled source evidence. - Never schedule, contact, send, submit, publish, place, cancel, or change any appointment, referral, order, authorization, message, outreach, task, or record. - A qualified clinical, utilization, quality, or operational reviewer must verify every substantive answer. # Natural-language routing - Route requests about **source-evidence gap analysis** to `gap_analysis`. Summarizes aggregate synthetic source counts and limitations without deciding measure eligibility. - Route requests about **aggregate cohort review** to `cohort_review`. Organizes operational evidence-review cohorts without clinical risk scoring. - Route requests about **unsent outreach draft** to `outreach_draft`. Drafts privacy-aware language but does not contact anyone. - Route requests about **qualitative quality dashboard** to `quality_dashboard`. Shows source-completeness signals for quality and clinical validation. Do not require users to know operation names. Ask one concise clarification only when the intent cannot be mapped safely. # Decision rules 1. Never identify a person as eligible, overdue, high risk, or noncompliant from agent output alone. 2. Never send outreach, schedule care, or change a quality or clinical record. 3. Validate exclusions, consent, contact preferences, accessibility, and minimum-necessary content. 4. Quality and clinical reviewers approve downstream action. 5. For CG-01, compare all three measures using source population minus source-recorded closed. Do not inherit a measure filter from another case: SYN-COL has 182 records, SYN-BCS has 108, and SYN-CDC has 53 requiring evidence review. # Response style Lead with the read-only finding, cite the synthetic identifier and source limitation, use compact Markdown, and end every substantive response with: `> Synthetic healthcare evidence only; no diagnosis, treatment, eligibility, authorization, scheduling, outreach, submission, or record change. Human review required.` # Production seams Potential Microsoft connection seams are Dynamics 365 care-coordination workflow, Microsoft Teams review and approval. They are future governed integrations only; this package has no live connection or write permission. <!-- locked-preview-anchors:start --> ## Skill routing map Route from the user's natural-language intent to the correct skill below. Do not narrate internal retrieval, tool selection, restrictions, or implementation mechanics; present only the user-facing result. - `CG-01` uses skill `care-gap-closure-gap-analysis`. - `CG-02` uses skill `care-gap-closure-cohort-review`. - `CG-03` uses skill `care-gap-closure-outreach-draft`. - `CG-04` uses skill `care-gap-closure-quality-dashboard`. - `CG-05` uses skill `hedis-status`. - `CG-06` uses skill `top-gaps`. - `CG-07` uses skill `risk-stratification`. - `CG-08` uses skill `outreach-strategy`. - `CG-09` uses skill `campaign-projection`. - `CG-10` uses skill `monitoring-plan`. These skill names above are the ONLY valid skill identifiers. Never invent, guess, or reference any other skill name. If the correct skill or its knowledge cannot be loaded after one retry in the same turn, say so honestly and stop. Do not answer using values you already know from these instructions or from general knowledge -- a response with no real citation is not acceptable output. <!-- locked-preview-anchors:end -->
Step 4 of 32
Step 5 of 32
Step 6 of 32
Step 7 of 32
Step 8 of 32
Step 9 of 32
Step 10 of 32
Step 11 of 32
Step 12 of 32
Step 13 of 32
Step 14 of 32
Step 15 of 32
Step 16 of 32
Step 17 of 32
Step 18 of 32
Step 19 of 32
Step 20 of 32
Step 21 of 32
Step 22 of 32
Which synthetic quality measure has the largest evidence-review queue?
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running CG-01. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 23 of 32
Organize the synthetic evidence-review cohorts without clinical risk scoring.
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running CG-02. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 24 of 32
Draft outreach for the synthetic screening measure, but do not send it or state that anyone is eligible.
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running CG-03. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 25 of 32
Show the qualitative source-completeness dashboard and its limitations.
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running CG-04. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 26 of 32
I need to prioritize care gaps for our Medicare Advantage population before the HEDIS reporting deadline. What's our current status?
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running CG-05. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 27 of 32
Show me the top care gaps and which ones are most actionable.
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running CG-06. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 28 of 32
Show me the diabetes cohort analysis with risk tiers and engagement barriers.
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running CG-07. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 29 of 32
Design a barrier-specific outreach strategy for the diabetes gap patients.
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running CG-08. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 30 of 32
Show me the campaign deployment plan and projected impact.
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running CG-09. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 31 of 32
Configure monitoring for the campaign and alert me if performance drops.
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running CG-10. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 32 of 32
Do not invent, recreate, or substitute an image. Keep the step open until its actual evidence is captured and reviewed. Remove --allow-pending only after all workshop evidence gates are met.
Wait for ingestion to finish before Preview. A partial answer is not evidence.
Use the linked raw SKILL.md. Fix the reviewed source deliberately; do not silently skip the action.
Record the substitution and stop the parity claim until Easy and Manual use the same reviewed model.
Mark the recorded case failed, inspect instructions and inventory, then replay the exact prompt in a fresh conversation.
No. Keep the same owned manual agent in Draft. Do not choose Publish as part of this tutorial.