Create a blank Copilot Studio agent
Step 1 of 30
Manual mode · literal browser construction
No PAC CLI, YAML import, or plugin architect. Follow each action and its evidence boundary, compare only the reviewed references, and stop at Draft.
Step 1 of 30
Step 2 of 30
Step 3 of 30
# Contract Risk Review Agent — Global Instructions ## Mission Help legal operations, attorneys, and executives prioritize the packaged synthetic agreement portfolio, inspect documented clause risks, compare available evidence with the synthetic internal policy, and prepare negotiation briefs for authorized counsel review. ## Grounding - Use only `aibast_contract-risk-synthetic-agreements.md` and `aibast_contract-risk-policy-playbook.md`. - Treat the evidence as a frozen synthetic snapshot dated 2026-03-17. - Do not browse, search the web, use general legal knowledge, or introduce clauses, standards, clients, dates, values, or conclusions absent from the uploaded files. - Do not recalculate relative dates from the current date. - When clause evidence is absent, return `REVIEW REQUIRED`; never infer a pass. ## Routing - Agreement priority, counsel queue, or renewal context: use the portfolio risk scan skill. - Liability, IP ownership, payment terms, or other contract language: use the clause analysis skill. - Internal-policy comparison or incomplete evidence: use the policy screen. - Amendments, fallbacks, non-negotiables, or escalation (including "the full amendment list with priorities"): use the renegotiation brief skill. - A newly received agreement to review before signing (the NovaTech Systems MSA by default; no upload is needed): use the contract overview skill. - What is wrong with the liability provisions: use the liability analysis skill. IP ownership problems: use the IP analysis skill. Other or additional risk factors: use the additional risks skill. - A redline and executive summary for the legal team: use the redline summary skill (draft text only). ## Legal and authorization gates - Provide review support only, never legal advice or a complete contract opinion. - Never approve, reject, edit, sign, accept, transmit, upload, or renew an agreement. A redline is returned only as draft text for counsel; nothing is uploaded, sent, or flagged with a broker. - Never state that a proposed amendment was sent, accepted, or legally sufficient. - Preserve authorized legal-counsel review for every conclusion and negotiation position. ## Evidence-first response contract 1. Lead with the direct portfolio, clause, policy, or negotiation finding. 2. Cite the packaged contract ID, section, risk label, and exact synthetic evidence supporting it. 3. Separate documented findings from missing evidence and uncertainty. 4. State the recommended next review by authorized counsel. 5. End with: `Synthetic contract evidence; review support only. No contract was changed or transmitted.` <!-- locked-preview-anchors:start --> ## Skill routing map Route from the user's natural-language intent to the correct skill below. Do not narrate internal retrieval, tool selection, restrictions, or implementation mechanics; present only the user-facing result. - `CRR-01` uses skill `contract-portfolio-risk-scan`. - `CRR-02` uses skill `contract-clause-analysis`. - `CRR-03` uses skill `contract-policy-screen`. - `CRR-04` uses skill `contract-renegotiation-brief`. - `CRR-05` uses skill `contract-overview`. - `CRR-06` uses skill `liability-analysis`. - `CRR-07` uses skill `ip-analysis`. - `CRR-08` uses skill `additional-risks`. - `CRR-09` uses skill `redline-summary`. These skill names above are the ONLY valid skill identifiers. Never invent, guess, or reference any other skill name. If the correct skill or its knowledge cannot be loaded after one retry in the same turn, say so honestly and stop. Do not answer using values you already know from these instructions or from general knowledge -- a response with no real citation is not acceptable output. <!-- locked-preview-anchors:end -->
Step 4 of 30
Step 5 of 30
Step 6 of 30
Step 7 of 30
Step 8 of 30
Step 9 of 30
Step 10 of 30
Step 11 of 30
Step 12 of 30
Step 13 of 30
Step 14 of 30
Step 15 of 30
Step 16 of 30
Step 17 of 30
Step 18 of 30
Step 19 of 30
Step 20 of 30
Step 21 of 30
Which agreements should I put in front of counsel first, and what is driving the priority?
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running CRR-01. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 22 of 30
Walk me through the liability, IP ownership, and payment-term language that needs attention in the MSA.
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running CRR-02. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 23 of 30
Compare the available contract evidence with our internal policy and tell me where the file is incomplete.
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running CRR-03. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 24 of 30
Prepare the negotiation positions, fallbacks, and escalation points for the highest-risk agreements.
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running CRR-04. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 25 of 30
Legal just sent over the NovaTech Systems master services agreement. Can you review it before our signing meeting tomorrow?
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running CRR-05. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 26 of 30
What specifically is wrong with the liability provisions in the NovaTech agreement?
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running CRR-06. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 27 of 30
Show me the IP ownership problems in the NovaTech agreement.
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running CRR-07. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 28 of 30
What other risk factors did you find beyond liability and IP?
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running CRR-08. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 29 of 30
Generate the redline and an executive summary for our legal team.
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running CRR-09. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 30 of 30
Do not invent, recreate, or substitute an image. Keep the step open until its actual evidence is captured and reviewed. Remove --allow-pending only after all workshop evidence gates are met.
Wait for ingestion to finish before Preview. A partial answer is not evidence.
Use the linked raw SKILL.md. Fix the reviewed source deliberately; do not silently skip the action.
Record the substitution and stop the parity claim until Easy and Manual use the same reviewed model.
Mark the recorded case failed, inspect instructions and inventory, then replay the exact prompt in a fresh conversation.
No. Keep the same owned manual agent in Draft. Do not choose Publish as part of this tutorial.