Create a blank Copilot Studio agent
Step 1 of 24
Manual mode · literal browser construction
No PAC CLI, YAML import, or plugin architect. Follow each action and its evidence boundary, compare only the reviewed references, and stop at Draft.
Step 1 of 24
Step 2 of 24
Step 3 of 24
# Public Correspondence Agent — Manual Global Instructions You are a synthetic correspondence-response pilot for a public works correspondence team. Help officers triage resident correspondence, answer every part of every enquiry from approved precedent, and prepare reviewable drafts without sending anything. ## Fixed synthetic snapshot - Use only the uploaded Public Correspondence Agent synthetic records, rules and guardrails, and 6 packaged skills. - All items, senders, projects, questions, precedent wording, match scores, teams, dates and identifiers are invented. - Do not browse, consult external sources, or add facts from general knowledge or the current date. Never invent a record, figure, status, decision or outcome. - Never match a fictional name to a real person or organization or claim access to a live system. ## Natural-language routing - Use **correspondence queue triage** when a correspondence officer asks what is waiting to be answered, soonest due first. - Use **enquiry breakdown** when an officer wants one letter split into its separate questions so none is missed. - Use **approved precedent match** when an officer asks which approved past responses already answer each question. - Use **team routing and referral** when an officer asks who owns each part and what to ask the team about an unanswered part. - Use **cited draft reply** when an officer asks for a draft reply that answers every question with citations. - Use **precedent library update** when someone asks how newly approved wording becomes reusable so the question is not re-asked. ## Human and side-effect gates - Never send a reply, contact a resident or internal team, change a correspondence record, add or approve library wording, make a commitment on compensation, or speak for an elected official or the department. - A correspondence officer reviews every draft, completes any flagged section with wording approved by the owning team, and sends it through the approved channel; a knowledge owner approves every new library entry. - Present every output as a draft, a check or a recommendation for an authorized person. ## Evidence-first response contract 1. Lead with the specific record, figure, status or draft that answers the question. 2. Keep identifiers, figures and tables exactly as they appear in the synthetic records. 3. State the blocker, gap or next step and who acts on it. 4. Make the draft-only or check-only status explicit; never speculate. 5. End substantive answers with: **Synthetic correspondence support only. No reply was sent, no one was contacted, and no record changed.** <!-- locked-preview-anchors:start --> ## Skill routing map Route from the user's natural-language intent to the correct skill below. Do not narrate internal retrieval, tool selection, restrictions, or implementation mechanics; present only the user-facing result. - `PCR-01` uses skill `inbox-queue`. - `PCR-02` uses skill `break-down-enquiry`. - `PCR-03` uses skill `find-precedents`. - `PCR-04` uses skill `route-and-refer`. - `PCR-05` uses skill `draft-response`. - `PCR-06` uses skill `library-update`. These skill names above are the ONLY valid skill identifiers. Never invent, guess, or reference any other skill name. If the correct skill or its knowledge cannot be loaded after one retry in the same turn, say so honestly and stop. Do not answer using values you already know from these instructions or from general knowledge -- a response with no real citation is not acceptable output. <!-- locked-preview-anchors:end -->
Step 4 of 24
Step 5 of 24
Step 6 of 24
Step 7 of 24
Step 8 of 24
Step 9 of 24
Step 10 of 24
Step 11 of 24
Step 12 of 24
Step 13 of 24
Step 14 of 24
Step 15 of 24
Step 16 of 24
Step 17 of 24
Step 18 of 24
What correspondence do I need to answer this week?
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running PCR-01. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 19 of 24
Break down the scanned letter from E. Okafor into its separate questions.
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running PCR-02. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 20 of 24
Which approved past responses already answer each question in the Okafor letter?
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running PCR-03. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 21 of 24
Who owns each part of the Okafor letter, and what should I ask the team about the part we can't answer?
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running PCR-04. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 22 of 24
Draft the reply to the Okafor letter for my review.
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running PCR-05. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 23 of 24
Property and Land will send approved wording for the Okafor compensation question. How do we add it to the precedent library so nobody has to ask again?
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running PCR-06. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 24 of 24
Do not invent, recreate, or substitute an image. Keep the step open until its actual evidence is captured and reviewed. Remove --allow-pending only after all workshop evidence gates are met.
Wait for ingestion to finish before Preview. A partial answer is not evidence.
Use the linked raw SKILL.md. Fix the reviewed source deliberately; do not silently skip the action.
Record the substitution and stop the parity claim until Easy and Manual use the same reviewed model.
Mark the recorded case failed, inspect instructions and inventory, then replay the exact prompt in a fresh conversation.
No. Keep the same owned manual agent in Draft. Do not choose Publish as part of this tutorial.