<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>The New Future of Work Reader</title>
  <link href="https://microsoft.github.io/nfw-reader/"/>
  <link rel="self" href="https://microsoft.github.io/nfw-reader/feed.xml"/>
  <updated>2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Microsoft</name>
  </author>
  <id>https://microsoft.github.io/nfw-reader/</id>
  <entry>
    <title>Building a grammar of work</title>
    <link href="https://microsoft.github.io/nfw-reader/posts/rhythms-of-work"/>
    <id>https://microsoft.github.io/nfw-reader/posts/rhythms-of-work</id>
    <published>2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <updated>2026-08-13T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <summary>AI agents can read a task and still miss the larger patterns of a person’s work. Researchers organized 667 million workplace events at four temporal scales and found that the resulting “grammar of work” structure carried predictive signal beyond recent actions.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Seven Predictions from Microsoft’s Chief Scientist</title>
    <link href="https://microsoft.github.io/nfw-reader/posts/seven-predictions"/>
    <id>https://microsoft.github.io/nfw-reader/posts/seven-predictions</id>
    <published>2026-08-06T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <updated>2026-08-06T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <summary>Jaime Teevan makes seven predictions for a world where knowledge is abundant, but attention is scarce: reading becomes asking, audiences start to participate, meetings turn into places you return to, and organizations finally become legible to themselves.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Beyond the Org Chart: AI and the Transformation of Invisible Work</title>
    <link href="https://microsoft.github.io/nfw-reader/posts/beyond-the-org-chart"/>
    <id>https://microsoft.github.io/nfw-reader/posts/beyond-the-org-chart</id>
    <published>2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <updated>2026-07-29T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <summary>Interviews with 24 professionals show how AI is changing the communication, mentoring, feedback, and relationship-building work that formal job descriptions rarely capture.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>What Copilot can’t see when it helps you write an email</title>
    <link href="https://microsoft.github.io/nfw-reader/posts/context-ai-doesnt-see"/>
    <id>https://microsoft.github.io/nfw-reader/posts/context-ai-doesnt-see</id>
    <published>2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <updated>2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <summary>A prompt can sound complete while leaving out situational context that shapes what an email needs to do. A study of 92 Microsoft professionals traces what participants knew, what reached the AI, and how they responded when drafts missed the mark.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Agentic Economy</title>
    <link href="https://microsoft.github.io/nfw-reader/posts/the-agentic-economy"/>
    <id>https://microsoft.github.io/nfw-reader/posts/the-agentic-economy</id>
    <published>2026-07-06T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <updated>2026-07-06T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <summary>A Microsoft Research team argues the biggest economic effect of AI agents may not be faster workers, but rather the collapse of the cost of buyers and sellers reaching and transacting with each other, and the redrawing of markets that follows.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Beyond the Prompt: Is AI doing more than we ask, or decomposing what we mean?</title>
    <link href="https://microsoft.github.io/nfw-reader/posts/beyond-the-ask"/>
    <id>https://microsoft.github.io/nfw-reader/posts/beyond-the-ask</id>
    <published>2026-06-22T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <updated>2026-06-22T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <summary>When knowledge workers use Copilot, the AI performs an average of 3.26 work activities per conversation — nearly double the 1.68 they explicitly ask for. A reading on the gap between what is asked and what is delivered, and why the conversation, not the task, is becoming the unit of accountability.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>How Copilot Changed the Pace of Work in Word — And How We Measured It</title>
    <link href="https://microsoft.github.io/nfw-reader/posts/causal-impact-copilot"/>
    <id>https://microsoft.github.io/nfw-reader/posts/causal-impact-copilot</id>
    <published>2026-06-18T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <updated>2026-06-18T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <summary>Using data from more than 72,000 Word users, researchers compared sustained Copilot adopters with similar coworkers who adopted later, and found the pace of work in Word changed markedly after adoption. The study introduces a new way to measure AI impact as products and people evolve together.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>AI Isn&apos;t Human</title>
    <link href="https://microsoft.github.io/nfw-reader/posts/ai-isnt-human"/>
    <id>https://microsoft.github.io/nfw-reader/posts/ai-isnt-human</id>
    <published>2026-05-15T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <updated>2026-05-15T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <summary>Early lessons from our first close encounter with a very different intelligence. Five ways AI is different from humans, and why those differences matter.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Five Million Conversations: How People Use Copilot at Work</title>
    <link href="https://microsoft.github.io/nfw-reader/posts/five-million-conversations"/>
    <id>https://microsoft.github.io/nfw-reader/posts/five-million-conversations</id>
    <published>2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <updated>2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <summary>Findings from an analysis of five million M365 Copilot conversations — what people actually do with AI at work, and what the patterns mean for organizations deploying it.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>What a randomized trial of 7,000 workers tells us about AI at work.</title>
    <link href="https://microsoft.github.io/nfw-reader/posts/shifting-work-patterns"/>
    <id>https://microsoft.github.io/nfw-reader/posts/shifting-work-patterns</id>
    <published>2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <updated>2026-05-14T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <summary>A six-month randomized trial across 66 large firms and 7,137 workers watched what happens when people actually get an integrated AI assistant for their email, meetings, and documents. This is the story of which patterns moved, which held still, and why the answer matters for how organizations should think about deploying AI.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Scaffolding Human-AI Collaboration: A Field Experiment on Behavioral Protocols and Cognitive Reframing</title>
    <link href="https://microsoft.github.io/nfw-reader/posts/ai-mindset-experiment"/>
    <id>https://microsoft.github.io/nfw-reader/posts/ai-mindset-experiment</id>
    <published>2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z</published>
    <updated>2026-04-16T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <summary>A field experiment with retail employees at Gap Inc. testing how mindset interventions and behavioral scaffolding shape AI adoption and task performance.</summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
