Skip to main content

Contributing to Physical AI Toolchain

Contributions improve this reference architecture for the robotics and AI community. This project accepts contributions for infrastructure code (Terraform/shell), deployment automation, documentation, training scripts, and ML workflows.

Automated linting, component tests, Terraform tests, and smoke checks provide the validation baseline. Environment-dependent changes also require deployment or workflow evidence, which can incur Azure costs. Select validation appropriate to the changed components and document any untested scenarios.

Contributions can include:

  • Infrastructure improvements (Terraform modules, networking, security)
  • Deployment automation enhancements (shell scripts, Kubernetes manifests)
  • Documentation updates (guides, troubleshooting, architecture diagrams)
  • Training script optimizations (Python, MLflow integration)
  • Workflow templates (AzureML, OSMO)
  • Bug fixes and issue resolution

๐Ÿ“– Contributing Guidesโ€‹

GuideDescription
PrerequisitesRequired tools, Azure access, NGC credentials, build commands
Contribution WorkflowBug reports, feature requests, first contributions
Pull Request ProcessPR workflow, review process, update procedures
Infrastructure StyleTerraform conventions, shell script standards, copyright headers
Deployment ValidationValidation levels, testing templates, cost optimization
Cost ConsiderationsComponent costs, budgeting, regional pricing
Security ReviewSecurity checklist, credential handling, dependency updates
AccessibilityAccessibility scope, documentation and CLI output guidelines
Updating External ComponentsProcess for updating reused externally-maintained components
Documentation MaintenanceUpdate triggers, ownership, review criteria, freshness policy
Fuzzing and Property-Based TestingFuzz targets, property tests, Hypothesis and fast-check patterns
Roadmap12-month project roadmap, priorities, and success metrics

Quick Referenceโ€‹

Changing...Read...
Terraform modulesInfrastructure Style, then Deployment Validation
Shell scriptsInfrastructure Style
Training workflowsDeployment Validation (Level 4)
Security-sensitive codeSecurity Review
Any PRCost Considerations for testing budget
Accessibility requirementsFollow Accessibility for docs, CLI output, and the dataviewer UI
Documentation policyDocumentation Maintenance

๐Ÿ“‹ Prerequisitesโ€‹

Install required tools and configure Azure access before contributing. See Prerequisites and Build Validation for complete details including Azure access requirements, NVIDIA NGC setup, and build validation commands.

ToolMinimum Version
Terraform1.9.8
Azure CLI2.65.0
kubectl1.31
Helm4.2+
Node.js24+
Python3.12+
shellcheck0.10+

๐Ÿ“œ Code of Conductโ€‹

This project adopts the Microsoft Open Source Code of Conduct.

For more information, see the Code of Conduct FAQ or contact opencode@microsoft.com with questions or comments.

โ“ I Have a Questionโ€‹

Search existing resources before asking questions:

If you cannot find an answer:

  1. Open a new discussion in the Q&A category
  2. Provide context: What you are trying to accomplish, what you have tried, error messages or unexpected behavior
  3. Include relevant details: Azure region, Terraform version, deployment step, error logs

Maintainers and community members respond to discussions. For bugs or feature requests, use GitHub Issues instead.

๐Ÿค I Want To Contributeโ€‹

See the Contribution Workflow guide for detailed instructions on:

  • Legal notice and CLA requirements
  • Reporting bugs with deployment context
  • Suggesting enhancements
  • Making your first code contribution
  • Improving documentation

๐Ÿ’ฌ Commit Messagesโ€‹

This project uses Conventional Commits:

<type>(<scope>): <subject>

Types: feat, fix, refactor, perf, style, test, docs, build, ops, chore, security.

Select a scope from the commit-message instructions, such as infrastructure, training, scripts, docs, or build.

Use imperative descriptions and keep the subject under 100 bytes. For larger changes, use at most five body bullets totaling fewer than 300 bytes. End with an emoji attribution footer followed by - Generated by Copilot.

For complete commit message guidance with examples, see commit-message.instructions.md.

๐Ÿ“ Markdown Styleโ€‹

All Markdown documents require YAML frontmatter:

---
title: Document Title
description: Brief description (150 chars max)
author: Microsoft Robotics-AI Team
ms.date: YYYY-MM-DD
ms.topic: concept | how-to | reference | tutorial
---

Use ATX-style headers, tables for structured data, GitHub alert syntax for callouts, and language-specified code blocks. Validate with npm run lint:md.

For complete Markdown guidance, see docs-style-and-conventions.instructions.md.

๐Ÿ—๏ธ Infrastructure as Code Styleโ€‹

Infrastructure code follows strict conventions for consistency, security, and maintainability.

Key Terraform Conventionsโ€‹

  • Format with terraform fmt -recursive infrastructure/terraform/ before committing
  • Use descriptive snake_case variables; boolean inputs use the should_ prefix exclusively
  • Include standard tags on all Azure resources
  • Prefer managed identities over service principals
  • Store secrets in Key Vault, never in code

Key Shell Script Conventionsโ€‹

  • Begin scripts with #!/usr/bin/env bash and set -euo pipefail
  • Include header documentation with prerequisites, environment variables, and usage
  • Validate with shellcheck before committing

All source files require the Microsoft copyright header:

# Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation.
# Licensed under the MIT License.

For complete conventions with examples, see Infrastructure Style Guide.

๐Ÿงช Deployment Validationโ€‹

Run applicable automated checks and tests first. Add the deployment validation level required by the contribution scope, recording costs and any untested scenarios.

Validation Levelsโ€‹

LevelWhatWhen to UseCost
Level 1: Staticnpm run lint:tf:validate, shellcheck, npm run lint:mdEvery contribution$0
Level 2: Planterraform plan with documented outputTerraform changes$0
Level 3: DeploymentFull deployment in dev subscriptionMajor infrastructure changes$25-50
Level 4: WorkflowTraining job executionScript/workflow changes$5-30

Run relevant static checks from the repository root after installing dependencies:

npm ci
npm run lint:tf:validate
npm run lint:sh
npm run lint:md

Run the applicable tests listed in Testing Requirements. Deployment validation does not replace automated tests.

For complete validation procedures, testing templates, and cost optimization strategies, see Deployment Validation Guide.

๐Ÿ”„ Pull Request Processโ€‹

See the Pull Request Process guide for the complete workflow including reviewer assignment, review cycles, approval criteria, and update process.

๐Ÿ’ฐ Cost Considerationsโ€‹

Full deployment testing incurs Azure costs. Plan accordingly and destroy resources promptly.

NOTE

Cost estimates are historical illustrations, not current deployment quotes. The component estimates were captured on 2026-02-03 and use SKUs that differ from current defaults. Use the Azure Pricing Calculator for current rates.

Testing Budget Summaryโ€‹

Contribution TypeTypical CostTesting Approach
Documentation$0Linting only
Terraform modules$10-25Plan + short deployment
Training scripts$15-30Single training job
Full infrastructure$25-50Complete deployment cycle

Key Cost Driversโ€‹

  • GPU VMs: ~$3.06/hour per Standard_NC24ads_A100_v4 node
  • Managed services: ~$50-100/month combined (Storage, Key Vault, PostgreSQL, Redis)

Cost Minimizationโ€‹

Use the node_pools map in terraform.tfvars to limit GPU capacity. For autoscaled pools, set min_count and max_count; for fixed pools, set node_count and disable should_enable_auto_scaling. Preserve required networking: should_enable_private_endpoint and should_enable_private_aks_cluster select the network mode. Review should_enable_public_network_access separately.

Initialize subscription context before Terraform operations, use the same reviewed variable file for plan, apply, and destroy, and destroy test resources promptly. See Deployment Validation for the command sequence.

For component cost breakdowns, budgeting commands, and regional pricing, see Cost Considerations Guide.

๐Ÿ”’ Security Review Processโ€‹

Security-sensitive contributions require additional review to ensure Azure best practices.

Security Review Scopeโ€‹

  • RBAC and permissions changes
  • Private endpoints and networking configuration
  • Credential handling and secrets management
  • Network policies and firewall rules
  • Workload identity configuration

Key Requirementsโ€‹

  • Managed identities over service principals
  • Secrets in Key Vault, never in code
  • Least privilege RBAC assignments
  • Security scanning before PR submission

Reporting Security Issuesโ€‹

DO NOT report vulnerabilities through public GitHub issues. Report to Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC). See SECURITY.md.

For the complete security checklist, dependency update process, and scanning requirements, see Security Review Guide.

โ™ฟ Accessibilityโ€‹

All contributions follow the project's Accessibility Best Practices.

Documentation standards:

  • Provide descriptive alt text for every image
  • Follow heading hierarchy without skipping levels
  • Use descriptive link text instead of raw URLs
  • Use tables and lists for structured data

CLI output standards:

  • Support the NO_COLOR standard in shell scripts
  • Shared color functions in scripts/lib/common.sh check NO_COLOR before emitting ANSI escape sequences

See Accessibility for full guidelines.

๐Ÿ“š Attributionโ€‹

This contributing guide is adapted for reference architecture contributions and Azure + NVIDIA robotics infrastructure.

Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. Licensed under the MIT License.