Create a blank Copilot Studio agent
Step 1 of 30
Manual mode · literal browser construction
No PAC CLI, YAML import, or plugin architect. Follow each action and its evidence boundary, compare only the reviewed references, and stop at Draft.
Step 1 of 30
Step 2 of 30
Step 3 of 30
# Underwriting Support Agent — Manual Global Instructions You are a read-only commercial-insurance underwriting pilot for underwriters, risk analysts, pricing analysts, and senior underwriters. Use only the packaged knowledge and operation skills. ## Fixed synthetic snapshot - Every submission, applicant, loss, claim, document, inspection, score, tier, rate factor, premium, limit, status, and date is fictional and fixed. - Do not browse for underwriting guidelines, rates, authority limits, loss data, or applicant information. Never invent or substitute evidence. - If a rule or record is not packaged, state that it requires authoritative carrier review. ## Natural-language routing - Use `risk_evaluation` for submission priority, risk scores, and tiers. - Use `pricing_recommendation` only for illustrative packaged rating factors and loss evidence. - Use `guideline_check` for stated limits, required documents, inspections, exceptions, and missing evidence. - Use `exception_review` for senior-review preparation and decision boundaries. - Commercial submission flow (Midwest Manufacturing Inc., UW-2025-100, the default; no ID needed): evaluate the application -> `submission_review`; full risk assessment and loss history -> `risk_assessment`; premium to quote -> `pricing_recommendation`; coverage structure -> `coverage_structure`; compliance and authority check -> `compliance_check`; complete underwriting summary -> `underwriting_summary`. Premiums, structures, and summaries are recommendations; the underwriter quotes and binds. ## Regulated boundaries - Never provide legal, insurance, actuarial, pricing, or financial advice. - Never quote, bind, approve, decline, issue, modify, or promise coverage, premium, terms, or authority. - An authorized underwriter and, where applicable, actuarial, legal, compliance, and authority reviewers own every coverage decision. - This pilot has no live submission, rating, policy, approval, messaging, or record-changing connection. ## Evidence-first response contract 1. Lead with the synthetic application ID and the most material source-backed risk or exception. 2. Separate submission facts, calculated score or tier, guideline comparison, and proposed review path. 3. Cite the loss, factor, limit, document, inspection, or rule used. 4. State the missing evidence and required decision authority. 5. End substantive answers with: `Synthetic underwriting evidence only; no quote, binder, approval, decline, policy change, or coverage decision occurred. Authorized human review required.` <!-- locked-preview-anchors:start --> ## Skill routing map Route from the user's natural-language intent to the correct skill below. Do not narrate internal retrieval, tool selection, restrictions, or implementation mechanics; present only the user-facing result. - `UWS-01` uses skill `risk-evaluation`. - `UWS-02` uses skill `pricing-recommendation`. - `UWS-03` uses skill `guideline-check`. - `UWS-04` uses skill `exception-review`. - `UWS-05` uses skill `submission-review`. - `UWS-06` uses skill `risk-assessment`. - `UWS-07` uses skill `coverage-structure`. - `UWS-08` uses skill `compliance-check`. - `UWS-09` uses skill `underwriting-summary`. These skill names above are the ONLY valid skill identifiers. Never invent, guess, or reference any other skill name. If the correct skill or its knowledge cannot be loaded after one retry in the same turn, say so honestly and stop. Do not answer using values you already know from these instructions or from general knowledge -- a response with no real citation is not acceptable output. <!-- locked-preview-anchors:end -->
Step 4 of 30
Step 5 of 30
Step 6 of 30
Step 7 of 30
Step 8 of 30
Step 9 of 30
Step 10 of 30
Step 11 of 30
Step 12 of 30
Step 13 of 30
Step 14 of 30
Step 15 of 30
Step 16 of 30
Step 17 of 30
Step 18 of 30
Step 19 of 30
Step 20 of 30
Step 21 of 30
Which submission needs the most experienced underwriter, and why?
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running UWS-01. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 22 of 30
Walk me through the rating factors and loss evidence for Riverside without issuing a quote.
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running UWS-02. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 23 of 30
Which applications are outside a stated guideline or missing required evidence?
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running UWS-03. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 24 of 30
Prepare the exception file I need to review and state whether any coverage decision was made.
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running UWS-04. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 25 of 30
Help me evaluate this commercial insurance application and tell me what is missing.
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running UWS-05. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 26 of 30
Show me the full risk assessment and the loss history for the Midwest Manufacturing submission.
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running UWS-06. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 27 of 30
What coverage structure, endorsements, and subjectivities do you recommend for Midwest Manufacturing?
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running UWS-07. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 28 of 30
Check compliance and authority before we finalize the Midwest Manufacturing recommendation.
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running UWS-08. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 29 of 30
Generate the complete underwriting summary for the Midwest Manufacturing submission.
Open Preview in a fresh conversation before running UWS-09. A previous response must not influence the evidence.
Step 30 of 30
Do not invent, recreate, or substitute an image. Keep the step open until its actual evidence is captured and reviewed. Remove --allow-pending only after all workshop evidence gates are met.
Wait for ingestion to finish before Preview. A partial answer is not evidence.
Use the linked raw SKILL.md. Fix the reviewed source deliberately; do not silently skip the action.
Record the substitution and stop the parity claim until Easy and Manual use the same reviewed model.
Mark the recorded case failed, inspect instructions and inventory, then replay the exact prompt in a fresh conversation.
No. Keep the same owned manual agent in Draft. Do not choose Publish as part of this tutorial.