OptiGuide with Nested Chats in AutoGen
This is a nested chat re-implementation of OptiGuide, which is an LLM-based supply chain optimization framework.
In addition to AutoGen, this notebook also requires eventlet and Gurobipy. The eventlet package is used in this notebook to constrain code execution with a timeout, and the gurobipy package is a mathematical optimization software library for solving mixed-integer linear and quadratic optimization problems.
Requirements
Some extra dependencies are needed for this notebook, which can be installed via pip:
pip install autogen-agentchat~=0.2 eventlet gurobipy
For more information, please refer to the installation guide.
import re
from typing import Union
# import auxiliary packages
import requests # for loading the example source code
from eventlet.timeout import Timeout
# test Gurobi installation
from gurobipy import GRB
from termcolor import colored
import autogen
from autogen.code_utils import extract_code
config_list_gpt4 = autogen.config_list_from_json(
"OAI_CONFIG_LIST",
filter_dict={
"model": ["gpt-4", "gpt4", "gpt-3.5-turbo" "gpt-4-32k", "gpt-4-32k-0314", "gpt-4-32k-v0314"],
},
)
llm_config = {"config_list": config_list_gpt4}
tip
Learn more about configuring LLMs for agents here.
Intended agent orchestration in OptiGuide.
Step 0. Prepare Helper Functions
The code cell below includes several helper functions to be used by agents. The helper functions are adopted directly from OptiGuide.
Utility Functions
Several utility functions (replace, insert_code, run_with_exec) are defined to manipulate and execute the source code dynamically:
-
replace(src_code, old_code, new_code) -> str:
Replaces a specified block of code within the source code with new code. This is essential for updating the code dynamically based on chatbot and user interactions. -
insert_code(src_code, new_lines) -> str:
Determines where to insert new lines of code based on specific markers in the source code. It’s used to seamlessly integrate generated code snippets. -
run_with_exec(src_code) -> Union[str, Exception]:
Executes the modified source code within a controlled environment, capturing and returning the output or any errors that occur. This function is crucial for testing the feasibility and correctness of the generated code solutions.
Functions External Code Retrieval
The cell also includes logic to retrieve example source code from a remote repository using the requests library. This example code serves as a base for the chatbot to work with, allowing users to see real-life applications of the concepts discussed.
The retrieved code is then displayed, showing both the beginning and the end of the source code to give a glimpse of its structure and content.
def replace(src_code: str, old_code: str, new_code: str) -> str:
"""
Inserts new code into the source code by replacing a specified old
code block.
Args:
src_code (str): The source code to modify.
old_code (str): The code block to be replaced.
new_code (str): The new code block to insert.
Returns:
str: The modified source code with the new code inserted.
Raises:
None
Example:
src_code = 'def hello_world():\n print("Hello, world!")\n\n# Some
other code here'
old_code = 'print("Hello, world!")'
new_code = 'print("Bonjour, monde!")\nprint("Hola, mundo!")'
modified_code = _replace(src_code, old_code, new_code)
print(modified_code)
# Output:
# def hello_world():
# print("Bonjour, monde!")
# print("Hola, mundo!")
# Some other code here
"""
pattern = r"( *){old_code}".format(old_code=old_code)
head_spaces = re.search(pattern, src_code, flags=re.DOTALL).group(1)
new_code = "\n".join([head_spaces + line for line in new_code.split("\n")])
rst = re.sub(pattern, new_code, src_code)
return rst
def insert_code(src_code: str, new_lines: str) -> str:
"""insert a code patch into the source code.
Args:
src_code (str): the full source code
new_lines (str): The new code.
Returns:
str: the full source code after insertion (replacement).
"""
if new_lines.find("addConstr") >= 0:
return replace(src_code, CONSTRAINT_CODE_STR, new_lines)
else:
return replace(src_code, DATA_CODE_STR, new_lines)
def run_with_exec(src_code: str) -> Union[str, Exception]:
"""Run the code snippet with exec.
Args:
src_code (str): The source code to run.
Returns:
object: The result of the code snippet.
If the code succeed, returns the objective value (float or string).
else, return the error (exception)
"""
locals_dict = {}
locals_dict.update(globals())
locals_dict.update(locals())
timeout = Timeout(
60,
TimeoutError("This is a timeout exception, in case " "GPT's code falls into infinite loop."),
)
try:
exec(src_code, locals_dict, locals_dict)
except Exception as e:
return e
finally:
timeout.cancel()
try:
status = locals_dict["m"].Status
if status != GRB.OPTIMAL:
if status == GRB.UNBOUNDED:
ans = "unbounded"
elif status == GRB.INF_OR_UNBD:
ans = "inf_or_unbound"
elif status == GRB.INFEASIBLE:
ans = "infeasible"
m = locals_dict["m"]
m.computeIIS()
constrs = [c.ConstrName for c in m.getConstrs() if c.IISConstr]
ans += "\nConflicting Constraints:\n" + str(constrs)
else:
ans = "Model Status:" + str(status)
else:
ans = "Optimization problem solved. The objective value is: " + str(locals_dict["m"].objVal)
except Exception as e:
return e
return ans
Step 1. Agent Construction
This cell introduces the Writer and OptiGuide agent classes and their instances to manage the interaction between the user, the chatbot, and the optimization solver. This streamlines the process of generating, evaluating, and integrating code solutions for supply chain optimization problems.
Classes Defined
-
OptiGuide: Inherits fromautogen.AssistantAgentand serves as the main class for handling the supply chain optimization logic. It maintains state information like the source code, debugging attempts left, success status, and user chat history. Key methods includeset_successandupdate_debug_times, which are used to update the agent’s state based on the outcomes of interactions. -
Writer: Also inherits fromautogen.AssistantAgent, this class is tailored to manage the generation and explanation of Python code solutions. It keeps track of the source code and example Q&A to assist in generating responses to user queries.
Agent Instances
-
writer,safeguard, andoptiguide_commander: Instances of the classes defined above, each configured with specific roles in the code generation and evaluation process. These agents work together to ensure that the user’s questions are answered with safe, optimized, and understandable Python code solutions. -
user: An instance ofautogen.UserProxyAgent, representing the end-user interacting with the notebook. It’s configured to simulate user inputs and responses, facilitating an interactive and engaging learning experience.
Agent System Messages
Each agent is associted with a corresponding system message. Those system messages are adopted directly from OptiGuide.
# %% System Messages
WRITER_SYSTEM_MSG = """You are a chatbot to:
(1) write Python code to answer users questions for supply chain-related coding
project;
(2) explain solutions from a Gurobi/Python solver.
--- SOURCE CODE ---
{source_code}
--- DOC STR ---
{doc_str}
---
Here are some example questions and their answers and codes:
--- EXAMPLES ---
{example_qa}
---
The execution result of the original source code is below.
--- Original Result ---
{execution_result}
Note that your written code will be added to the lines with substring:
"# OPTIGUIDE *** CODE GOES HERE"
So, you don't need to write other code, such as m.optimize() or m.update().
You just need to write code snippet in ```python ...``` block.
"""
SAFEGUARD_SYSTEM_MSG = """
Given the source code:
{source_code}
Is the source code safe (not malicious code to break security
and privacy) to run?
Answer only one word.
If not safe, answer `DANGER`; else, answer `SAFE`.
"""
# %% Constant strings to match code lines in the source code.
DATA_CODE_STR = "# OPTIGUIDE DATA CODE GOES HERE"
CONSTRAINT_CODE_STR = "# OPTIGUIDE CONSTRAINT CODE GOES HERE"
# In-context learning examples.
example_qa = """
----------
Question: Why is it not recommended to use just one supplier for roastery 2?
Answer Code:
```python
z = m.addVars(suppliers, vtype=GRB.BINARY, name="z")
m.addConstr(sum(z[s] for s in suppliers) <= 1, "_")
for s in suppliers:
m.addConstr(x[s,'roastery2'] <= capacity_in_supplier[s] * z[s], "_")
```
----------
Question: What if there's a 13% jump in the demand for light coffee at cafe1?
Answer Code:
```python
light_coffee_needed_for_cafe["cafe1"] = light_coffee_needed_for_cafe["cafe1"] * (1 + 13/100)
```
"""
CODE_PROMPT = """
Answer Code:
"""
DEBUG_PROMPT = """
While running the code you suggested, I encountered the {error_type}:
--- ERROR MESSAGE ---
{error_message}
Please try to resolve this bug, and rewrite the code snippet.
--- NEW CODE ---
"""
SAFEGUARD_PROMPT = """
--- Code ---
{code}
--- One-Word Answer: SAFE or DANGER ---
"""
INTERPRETER_PROMPT = """Here are the execution results: {execution_rst}
Can you organize these information to a human readable answer?
Remember to compare the new results to the original results you obtained in the
beginning.
--- HUMAN READABLE ANSWER ---
"""
# Get the source code of the coffee example from OptiGuide's official repo
code_url = "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/microsoft/OptiGuide/main/benchmark/application/coffee.py"
response = requests.get(code_url)
# Check if the request was successful
if response.status_code == 200:
# Get the text content from the response
code = response.text
else:
raise RuntimeError("Failed to retrieve the file.")
# code = open(code_url, "r").read() # for local files
# show the first head and tail of the source code
print("\n".join(code.split("\n")[:10]))
print(".\n" * 3)
print("\n".join(code.split("\n")[-10:]))
writer_system_msg = WRITER_SYSTEM_MSG.format(
source_code=code,
doc_str="",
example_qa=example_qa,
execution_result="",
)
safeguard_system_msg = SAFEGUARD_SYSTEM_MSG.format(source_code=code)
class OptiGuide(autogen.AssistantAgent):
source_code: str = code
debug_times: int = 3
debug_times_left: int = 3
example_qa: str = ""
success: bool = False
user_chat_history: str = ""
class Writer(autogen.AssistantAgent):
source_code: str = code
example_qa: str = ""
user_chat_history: str = ""
writer = Writer("writer", llm_config=llm_config)
safeguard = autogen.AssistantAgent("safeguard", llm_config=llm_config)
optiguide_commander = OptiGuide("commander", llm_config=llm_config)
user = autogen.UserProxyAgent(
"user", max_consecutive_auto_reply=0, human_input_mode="NEVER", code_execution_config=False
)
import time
from gurobipy import GRB, Model
# Example data
capacity_in_supplier = {'supplier1': 150, 'supplier2': 50, 'supplier3': 100}
shipping_cost_from_supplier_to_roastery = {
('supplier1', 'roastery1'): 5,
.
.
.
# Solve
m.update()
model.optimize()
print(time.ctime())
if m.status == GRB.OPTIMAL:
print(f'Optimal cost: {m.objVal}')
else:
print("Not solved to optimality. Optimization status:", m.status)
Step 2. Orchestrate Nested Chats
These three agent instances are orchestrated in the following way with
the writer and safeguard nested into the commander agent as the
inner monologue.
This next cell defines critical functions that manage the interactions
between the OptiGuide system, the user, and the internal logic for
processing and responding to queries. Each function plays a specific
role in guiding the conversation, handling code generation requests,
ensuring code safety, and summarizing outcomes. This ensures that agents
receive clear instructions, immediate feedback, and a secure environment
for exploring supply chain optimization problems through code.
Information about the sequence of chats can be specified in the
chat_queue argument of the register_nested_chats function. The
following fields are especially useful: - recipient (required)
specifies the nested agent; - message specifies what message to send
to the nested recipient agent. In a sequence of nested chats, if the
message field is not specified, we will use the last message the
registering agent received as the initial message in the first chat and
will skip any subsequent chat in the queue that does not have the
message field. You can either provide a string or define a callable
that returns a string. - summary_method decides what to get out of the
nested chat. You can either select from existing options including
“last_msg” and “reflection_with_llm”, or or define your own way on what
to get from the nested chat with a Callable. - max_turns determines
how many turns of conversation to have between the concerned agent
pairs.
def writer_init_messsage(recipient, messages, sender, config):
if recipient.success:
return None
msg_content = messages[-1].get("content", "")
# board = config
# get execution result of the original source code
sender_history = recipient.chat_messages[sender]
user_chat_history = "\nHere are the history of discussions:\n" f"{sender_history}"
if sender.name == "user":
execution_result = msg_content # TODO: get the execution result of the original source code
else:
execution_result = ""
writer_sys_msg = (
WRITER_SYSTEM_MSG.format(
source_code=recipient.source_code,
doc_str="",
example_qa=example_qa,
execution_result=execution_result,
)
+ user_chat_history
)
# safeguard.reset() #TODO: reset safeguard
recipient.debug_times_left = recipient.debug_times
recipient.success = False
return writer_sys_msg + "\n" + CODE_PROMPT
def writer_success_summary(recipient, sender):
if sender.success:
return sender.last_message(recipient)["content"].replace("TERMINATE", "")
else:
return "Sorry. I cannot answer your question."
def safeguard_init_message(recipient, messages, sender, config):
if recipient.success:
return None
last_msg_content = messages[-1].get("content", "")
_, code = extract_code(last_msg_content)[0]
if _ != "unknown":
return SAFEGUARD_SYSTEM_MSG.format(source_code=code) + sender.user_chat_history
else:
return
# return SAFEGUARD_SYSTEM_MSG.format(source_code=recipient.source_code)
def safeguard_summary(recipient, sender):
safe_msg = sender.last_message(recipient)["content"].replace("TERMINATE", "")
if safe_msg.find("DANGER") < 0:
# Step 4 and 5: Run the code and obtain the results
src_code = insert_code(sender.source_code, code)
execution_rst = run_with_exec(src_code)
print(colored(str(execution_rst), "yellow"))
if type(execution_rst) in [str, int, float]:
# we successfully run the code and get the result
sender.success = True
# Step 6: request to interpret results
return INTERPRETER_PROMPT.format(execution_rst=execution_rst)
else:
# DANGER: If not safe, try to debug. Redo coding
execution_rst = """
Sorry, this new code is not safe to run. I would not allow you to execute it.
Please try to find a new way (coding) to answer the question."""
if sender.debug_times_left > 0:
# Try to debug and write code again (back to step 2)
sender.debug_times_left -= 1
return DEBUG_PROMPT.format(error_type=type(execution_rst), error_message=str(execution_rst))
writer_chat_queue = [{"recipient": writer, "message": writer_init_messsage, "summary_method": writer_success_summary}]
safeguard_chat_queue = [
{"recipient": safeguard, "message": safeguard_init_message, "max_turns": 1, "summary_method": safeguard_summary}
]
# safeguard is triggered only when receiving a message from the writer
optiguide_commander.register_nested_chats(safeguard_chat_queue, trigger="writer")
# writer is triggered only when receiving a message from the user
optiguide_commander.register_nested_chats(writer_chat_queue, trigger="user")
Let the agents talk
chat_res = user.initiate_chat(
optiguide_commander, message="What if we prohibit shipping from supplier 1 to roastery 2?"
)
user (to commander):
What if we prohibit shipping from supplier 1 to roastery 2?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
********************************************************************************
Start a new chat with the following message:
You are a chatbot to:
(1) write Python code to answer users questions for supply chain-related coding
project;
(2) explain solutions from a Gurobi/Python solver.
--- SOURCE CODE ---
import time
from gurobipy import GRB, Model
# Example data
capacity_in_supplier = {'supplier1': 150, 'supplier2': 50, 'supplier3': 100}
shipping_cost_from_supplier_to_roastery = {
('supplier1', 'roastery1'): 5,
('supplier1', 'roastery2'): 4,
('supplier2', 'roastery1'): 6,
('supplier2', 'roastery2'): 3,
('supplier3', 'roastery1'): 2,
('supplier3', 'roastery2'): 7
}
roasting_cost_light = {'roastery1': 3, 'roastery2': 5}
roasting_cost_dark = {'roastery1': 5, 'roastery2': 6}
shipping_cost_from_roastery_to_cafe = {
('roastery1', 'cafe1'): 5,
('roastery1', 'cafe2'): 3,
('roastery1', 'cafe3'): 6,
('roastery2', 'cafe1'): 4,
('roastery2', 'cafe2'): 5,
('roastery2', 'cafe3'): 2
}
light_coffee_needed_for_cafe = {'cafe1': 20, 'cafe2': 30, 'cafe3': 40}
dark_coffee_needed_for_cafe = {'cafe1': 20, 'cafe2': 20, 'cafe3': 100}
cafes = list(set(i[1] for i in shipping_cost_from_roastery_to_cafe.keys()))
roasteries = list(
set(i[1] for i in shipping_cost_from_supplier_to_roastery.keys()))
suppliers = list(
set(i[0] for i in shipping_cost_from_supplier_to_roastery.keys()))
# Create a new model
model = Model("coffee_distribution")
# OPTIGUIDE DATA CODE GOES HERE
# Create variables
x = model.addVars(shipping_cost_from_supplier_to_roastery.keys(),
vtype=GRB.INTEGER,
name="x")
y_light = model.addVars(shipping_cost_from_roastery_to_cafe.keys(),
vtype=GRB.INTEGER,
name="y_light")
y_dark = model.addVars(shipping_cost_from_roastery_to_cafe.keys(),
vtype=GRB.INTEGER,
name="y_dark")
# Set objective
model.setObjective(
sum(x[i] * shipping_cost_from_supplier_to_roastery[i]
for i in shipping_cost_from_supplier_to_roastery.keys()) +
sum(roasting_cost_light[r] * y_light[r, c] +
roasting_cost_dark[r] * y_dark[r, c]
for r, c in shipping_cost_from_roastery_to_cafe.keys()) + sum(
(y_light[j] + y_dark[j]) * shipping_cost_from_roastery_to_cafe[j]
for j in shipping_cost_from_roastery_to_cafe.keys()), GRB.MINIMIZE)
# Conservation of flow constraint
for r in set(i[1] for i in shipping_cost_from_supplier_to_roastery.keys()):
model.addConstr(
sum(x[i] for i in shipping_cost_from_supplier_to_roastery.keys()
if i[1] == r) == sum(
y_light[j] + y_dark[j]
for j in shipping_cost_from_roastery_to_cafe.keys()
if j[0] == r), f"flow_{r}")
# Add supply constraints
for s in set(i[0] for i in shipping_cost_from_supplier_to_roastery.keys()):
model.addConstr(
sum(x[i] for i in shipping_cost_from_supplier_to_roastery.keys()
if i[0] == s) <= capacity_in_supplier[s], f"supply_{s}")
# Add demand constraints
for c in set(i[1] for i in shipping_cost_from_roastery_to_cafe.keys()):
model.addConstr(
sum(y_light[j] for j in shipping_cost_from_roastery_to_cafe.keys()
if j[1] == c) >= light_coffee_needed_for_cafe[c],
f"light_demand_{c}")
model.addConstr(
sum(y_dark[j] for j in shipping_cost_from_roastery_to_cafe.keys()
if j[1] == c) >= dark_coffee_needed_for_cafe[c],
f"dark_demand_{c}")
# Optimize model
model.optimize()
m = model
# OPTIGUIDE CONSTRAINT CODE GOES HERE
# Solve
m.update()
model.optimize()
print(time.ctime())
if m.status == GRB.OPTIMAL:
print(f'Optimal cost: {m.objVal}')
else:
print("Not solved to optimality. Optimization status:", m.status)
--- DOC STR ---
---
Here are some example questions and their answers and codes:
--- EXAMPLES ---
----------
Question: Why is it not recommended to use just one supplier for roastery 2?
Answer Code:
```python
z = m.addVars(suppliers, vtype=GRB.BINARY, name="z")
m.addConstr(sum(z[s] for s in suppliers) <= 1, "_")
for s in suppliers:
m.addConstr(x[s,'roastery2'] <= capacity_in_supplier[s] * z[s], "_")
```
----------
Question: What if there's a 13% jump in the demand for light coffee at cafe1?
Answer Code:
```python
light_coffee_needed_for_cafe["cafe1"] = light_coffee_needed_for_cafe["cafe1"] * (1 + 13/100)
```
---
The execution result of the original source code is below.
--- Original Result ---
What if we prohibit shipping from supplier 1 to roastery 2?
Note that your written code will be added to the lines with substring:
"# OPTIGUIDE *** CODE GOES HERE"
So, you don't need to write other code, such as m.optimize() or m.update().
You just need to write code snippet in ```python ...``` block.
Here are the history of discussions:
[{'content': 'What if we prohibit shipping from supplier 1 to roastery 2?', 'role': 'user'}]
Answer Code:
With the following carryover:
********************************************************************************
commander (to writer):
You are a chatbot to:
(1) write Python code to answer users questions for supply chain-related coding
project;
(2) explain solutions from a Gurobi/Python solver.
--- SOURCE CODE ---
import time
from gurobipy import GRB, Model
# Example data
capacity_in_supplier = {'supplier1': 150, 'supplier2': 50, 'supplier3': 100}
shipping_cost_from_supplier_to_roastery = {
('supplier1', 'roastery1'): 5,
('supplier1', 'roastery2'): 4,
('supplier2', 'roastery1'): 6,
('supplier2', 'roastery2'): 3,
('supplier3', 'roastery1'): 2,
('supplier3', 'roastery2'): 7
}
roasting_cost_light = {'roastery1': 3, 'roastery2': 5}
roasting_cost_dark = {'roastery1': 5, 'roastery2': 6}
shipping_cost_from_roastery_to_cafe = {
('roastery1', 'cafe1'): 5,
('roastery1', 'cafe2'): 3,
('roastery1', 'cafe3'): 6,
('roastery2', 'cafe1'): 4,
('roastery2', 'cafe2'): 5,
('roastery2', 'cafe3'): 2
}
light_coffee_needed_for_cafe = {'cafe1': 20, 'cafe2': 30, 'cafe3': 40}
dark_coffee_needed_for_cafe = {'cafe1': 20, 'cafe2': 20, 'cafe3': 100}
cafes = list(set(i[1] for i in shipping_cost_from_roastery_to_cafe.keys()))
roasteries = list(
set(i[1] for i in shipping_cost_from_supplier_to_roastery.keys()))
suppliers = list(
set(i[0] for i in shipping_cost_from_supplier_to_roastery.keys()))
# Create a new model
model = Model("coffee_distribution")
# OPTIGUIDE DATA CODE GOES HERE
# Create variables
x = model.addVars(shipping_cost_from_supplier_to_roastery.keys(),
vtype=GRB.INTEGER,
name="x")
y_light = model.addVars(shipping_cost_from_roastery_to_cafe.keys(),
vtype=GRB.INTEGER,
name="y_light")
y_dark = model.addVars(shipping_cost_from_roastery_to_cafe.keys(),
vtype=GRB.INTEGER,
name="y_dark")
# Set objective
model.setObjective(
sum(x[i] * shipping_cost_from_supplier_to_roastery[i]
for i in shipping_cost_from_supplier_to_roastery.keys()) +
sum(roasting_cost_light[r] * y_light[r, c] +
roasting_cost_dark[r] * y_dark[r, c]
for r, c in shipping_cost_from_roastery_to_cafe.keys()) + sum(
(y_light[j] + y_dark[j]) * shipping_cost_from_roastery_to_cafe[j]
for j in shipping_cost_from_roastery_to_cafe.keys()), GRB.MINIMIZE)
# Conservation of flow constraint
for r in set(i[1] for i in shipping_cost_from_supplier_to_roastery.keys()):
model.addConstr(
sum(x[i] for i in shipping_cost_from_supplier_to_roastery.keys()
if i[1] == r) == sum(
y_light[j] + y_dark[j]
for j in shipping_cost_from_roastery_to_cafe.keys()
if j[0] == r), f"flow_{r}")
# Add supply constraints
for s in set(i[0] for i in shipping_cost_from_supplier_to_roastery.keys()):
model.addConstr(
sum(x[i] for i in shipping_cost_from_supplier_to_roastery.keys()
if i[0] == s) <= capacity_in_supplier[s], f"supply_{s}")
# Add demand constraints
for c in set(i[1] for i in shipping_cost_from_roastery_to_cafe.keys()):
model.addConstr(
sum(y_light[j] for j in shipping_cost_from_roastery_to_cafe.keys()
if j[1] == c) >= light_coffee_needed_for_cafe[c],
f"light_demand_{c}")
model.addConstr(
sum(y_dark[j] for j in shipping_cost_from_roastery_to_cafe.keys()
if j[1] == c) >= dark_coffee_needed_for_cafe[c],
f"dark_demand_{c}")
# Optimize model
model.optimize()
m = model
# OPTIGUIDE CONSTRAINT CODE GOES HERE
# Solve
m.update()
model.optimize()
print(time.ctime())
if m.status == GRB.OPTIMAL:
print(f'Optimal cost: {m.objVal}')
else:
print("Not solved to optimality. Optimization status:", m.status)
--- DOC STR ---
---
Here are some example questions and their answers and codes:
--- EXAMPLES ---
----------
Question: Why is it not recommended to use just one supplier for roastery 2?
Answer Code:
```python
z = m.addVars(suppliers, vtype=GRB.BINARY, name="z")
m.addConstr(sum(z[s] for s in suppliers) <= 1, "_")
for s in suppliers:
m.addConstr(x[s,'roastery2'] <= capacity_in_supplier[s] * z[s], "_")
```
----------
Question: What if there's a 13% jump in the demand for light coffee at cafe1?
Answer Code:
```python
light_coffee_needed_for_cafe["cafe1"] = light_coffee_needed_for_cafe["cafe1"] * (1 + 13/100)
```
---
The execution result of the original source code is below.
--- Original Result ---
What if we prohibit shipping from supplier 1 to roastery 2?
Note that your written code will be added to the lines with substring:
"# OPTIGUIDE *** CODE GOES HERE"
So, you don't need to write other code, such as m.optimize() or m.update().
You just need to write code snippet in ```python ...``` block.
Here are the history of discussions:
[{'content': 'What if we prohibit shipping from supplier 1 to roastery 2?', 'role': 'user'}]
Answer Code:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
writer (to commander):
To answer the user's question regarding the prohibition of shipping from supplier 1 to roastery 2, we need to add a constraint to the optimization model that sets the shipping quantity `x` for the (`supplier1`, `roastery2`) route to zero. This will effectively disallow any shipping from supplier 1 to roastery 2. The code to do this should be placed in the section of the source code that is indicated by the comment "# OPTIGUIDE DATA CODE GOES HERE".
Here's the Python code snippet to add this constraint:
```python
# filename: supply_chain_code.py
model.addConstr(x[('supplier1', 'roastery2')] == 0, "prohibit_supplier1_roastery2")
```
Adding this constraint will prevent the optimizer from selecting any transport from `supplier1` to `roastery2`, which is what the prohibition is intended to achieve.
Instruct the user to add this code snippet in the appropriate place in the source code that they have provided. After adding this code, the `m.optimize()` function will solve the modified version of the problem that includes the new constraint.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
********************************************************************************
Start a new chat with the following message:
Given the source code:
# filename: supply_chain_code.py
model.addConstr(x[('supplier1', 'roastery2')] == 0, "prohibit_supplier1_roastery2")
Is the source code safe (not malicious code to break security
and privacy) to run?
Answer only one word.
If not safe, answer `DANGER`; else, answer `SAFE`.
With the following carryover:
********************************************************************************
commander (to safeguard):
Given the source code:
# filename: supply_chain_code.py
model.addConstr(x[('supplier1', 'roastery2')] == 0, "prohibit_supplier1_roastery2")
Is the source code safe (not malicious code to break security
and privacy) to run?
Answer only one word.
If not safe, answer `DANGER`; else, answer `SAFE`.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
safeguard (to commander):
SAFE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gurobi Optimizer version 11.0.0 build v11.0.0rc2 (mac64[arm] - Darwin 23.2.0 23C71)
CPU model: Apple M3 Max
Thread count: 14 physical cores, 14 logical processors, using up to 14 threads
Optimize a model with 11 rows, 18 columns and 36 nonzeros
Model fingerprint: 0x8aa2c280
Variable types: 0 continuous, 18 integer (0 binary)
Coefficient statistics:
Matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00]
Objective range [2e+00, 1e+01]
Bounds range [0e+00, 0e+00]
RHS range [2e+01, 2e+02]
Found heuristic solution: objective 2900.0000000
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 11 rows, 18 columns, 36 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 18 integer (0 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 2896.0000000
Root relaxation: objective 2.470000e+03, 11 iterations, 0.00 seconds (0.00 work units)
Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work
Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time
* 0 0 0 2470.0000000 2470.00000 0.00% - 0s
Explored 1 nodes (11 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds (0.00 work units)
Thread count was 14 (of 14 available processors)
Solution count 3: 2470 2896 2900
Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.470000000000e+03, best bound 2.470000000000e+03, gap 0.0000%
Gurobi Optimizer version 11.0.0 build v11.0.0rc2 (mac64[arm] - Darwin 23.2.0 23C71)
CPU model: Apple M3 Max
Thread count: 14 physical cores, 14 logical processors, using up to 14 threads
Optimize a model with 11 rows, 18 columns and 36 nonzeros
Model fingerprint: 0x8aa2c280
Variable types: 0 continuous, 18 integer (0 binary)
Coefficient statistics:
Matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00]
Objective range [2e+00, 1e+01]
Bounds range [0e+00, 0e+00]
RHS range [2e+01, 2e+02]
Found heuristic solution: objective 2900.0000000
Presolve time: 0.00s
Presolved: 11 rows, 18 columns, 36 nonzeros
Variable types: 0 continuous, 18 integer (0 binary)
Found heuristic solution: objective 2896.0000000
Root relaxation: objective 2.470000e+03, 11 iterations, 0.00 seconds (0.00 work units)
Nodes | Current Node | Objective Bounds | Work
Expl Unexpl | Obj Depth IntInf | Incumbent BestBd Gap | It/Node Time
* 0 0 0 2470.0000000 2470.00000 0.00% - 0s
Explored 1 nodes (11 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds (0.00 work units)
Thread count was 14 (of 14 available processors)
Solution count 3: 2470 2896 2900
Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.470000000000e+03, best bound 2.470000000000e+03, gap 0.0000%
Gurobi Optimizer version 11.0.0 build v11.0.0rc2 (mac64[arm] - Darwin 23.2.0 23C71)
CPU model: Apple M3 Max
Thread count: 14 physical cores, 14 logical processors, using up to 14 threads
Optimize a model with 11 rows, 18 columns and 36 nonzeros
Model fingerprint: 0x8aa2c280
Variable types: 0 continuous, 18 integer (0 binary)
Coefficient statistics:
Matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00]
Objective range [2e+00, 1e+01]
Bounds range [0e+00, 0e+00]
RHS range [2e+01, 2e+02]
Presolved: 11 rows, 18 columns, 36 nonzeros
Continuing optimization...
Explored 1 nodes (11 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds (0.00 work units)
Thread count was 14 (of 14 available processors)
Solution count 3: 2470 2896 2900
Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.470000000000e+03, best bound 2.470000000000e+03, gap 0.0000%
Sun Feb 25 18:56:45 2024
Optimal cost: 2470.0
Gurobi Optimizer version 11.0.0 build v11.0.0rc2 (mac64[arm] - Darwin 23.2.0 23C71)
CPU model: Apple M3 Max
Thread count: 14 physical cores, 14 logical processors, using up to 14 threads
Optimize a model with 11 rows, 18 columns and 36 nonzeros
Model fingerprint: 0x8aa2c280
Variable types: 0 continuous, 18 integer (0 binary)
Coefficient statistics:
Matrix range [1e+00, 1e+00]
Objective range [2e+00, 1e+01]
Bounds range [0e+00, 0e+00]
RHS range [2e+01, 2e+02]
Presolved: 11 rows, 18 columns, 36 nonzeros
Continuing optimization...
Explored 1 nodes (11 simplex iterations) in 0.00 seconds (0.00 work units)
Thread count was 14 (of 14 available processors)
Solution count 3: 2470 2896 2900
Optimal solution found (tolerance 1.00e-04)
Best objective 2.470000000000e+03, best bound 2.470000000000e+03, gap 0.0000%
Sun Feb 25 18:56:45 2024
Optimal cost: 2470.0
Optimization problem solved. The objective value is: 2470.0
commander (to writer):
Here are the execution results: Optimization problem solved. The objective value is: 2470.0
Can you organize these information to a human readable answer?
Remember to compare the new results to the original results you obtained in the
beginning.
--- HUMAN READABLE ANSWER ---
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
writer (to commander):
Certainly! Here's a human-readable answer:
After integrating the constraint to prohibit shipping from supplier 1 to roastery 2, the optimization problem was solved with a total cost of $2470.0.
To provide context to this result, we need to compare it with the original total cost prior to the implementation of the new constraint. However, the original total cost was not provided in the information given to me. If the original total cost was known, we would compare the two to understand the financial impact of this constraint on the supply chain.
If prohibiting shipping from supplier 1 to roastery 2 results in a higher cost than the original scenario, it suggests that the previous ability to ship from supplier 1 to roastery 2 had been cost-effective and beneficial for minimizing overall expenses. On the other hand, if the cost is the same or lower, then shipping from supplier 1 to roastery 2 may not have been crucial for the cost optimization of the supply chain, or other routes may have been able to compensate effectively for this restriction.
Without the original cost for comparison, we can't conclusively say how the prohibition impacted the cost of operation. But the new total cost of $2470.0 will be the baseline for future changes or optimizations done following this new restriction.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
commander (to user):
Certainly! Here's a human-readable answer:
After integrating the constraint to prohibit shipping from supplier 1 to roastery 2, the optimization problem was solved with a total cost of $2470.0.
To provide context to this result, we need to compare it with the original total cost prior to the implementation of the new constraint. However, the original total cost was not provided in the information given to me. If the original total cost was known, we would compare the two to understand the financial impact of this constraint on the supply chain.
If prohibiting shipping from supplier 1 to roastery 2 results in a higher cost than the original scenario, it suggests that the previous ability to ship from supplier 1 to roastery 2 had been cost-effective and beneficial for minimizing overall expenses. On the other hand, if the cost is the same or lower, then shipping from supplier 1 to roastery 2 may not have been crucial for the cost optimization of the supply chain, or other routes may have been able to compensate effectively for this restriction.
Without the original cost for comparison, we can't conclusively say how the prohibition impacted the cost of operation. But the new total cost of $2470.0 will be the baseline for future changes or optimizations done following this new restriction.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get Final Results from the Returned ChatResult Object
print(chat_res.summary)
Certainly! Here's a human-readable answer:
After integrating the constraint to prohibit shipping from supplier 1 to roastery 2, the optimization problem was solved with a total cost of $2470.0.
To provide context to this result, we need to compare it with the original total cost prior to the implementation of the new constraint. However, the original total cost was not provided in the information given to me. If the original total cost was known, we would compare the two to understand the financial impact of this constraint on the supply chain.
If prohibiting shipping from supplier 1 to roastery 2 results in a higher cost than the original scenario, it suggests that the previous ability to ship from supplier 1 to roastery 2 had been cost-effective and beneficial for minimizing overall expenses. On the other hand, if the cost is the same or lower, then shipping from supplier 1 to roastery 2 may not have been crucial for the cost optimization of the supply chain, or other routes may have been able to compensate effectively for this restriction.
Without the original cost for comparison, we can't conclusively say how the prohibition impacted the cost of operation. But the new total cost of $2470.0 will be the baseline for future changes or optimizations done following this new restriction.